When to Reposition Your Brand
Your brand position, at its core, is a statement reflecting the perception your desired target audience holds to represent your values, offerings,...
Have you ever been part of a rebranding project and had a board member or senior leader say, "That's not who we are."
Often, the people who know your business best struggle to see beyond what you are today.
Here's the thing nobody wants to say out loud: institutional knowledge is both your greatest asset and your biggest liability when you're trying to rebrand. The same people who built your current success will fight the hardest to protect it. Even when protecting it may stunt growth.
When someone's been at your company for several years, they know things. They know why certain decisions were made. They know what failed in 2019 and why. They know what customers tend to say in focus groups.
That's valuable. Until it's not.
Because all that knowledge comes with baggage. They remember when you tried something bold and it didn't work. They remember the complaint emails. They remember the executive who got fired after the last rebrand went sideways.
So when you show them something new, they're not evaluating it against where the organization needs to go. They're evaluating it against every mistake they've witnessed. And they'll kill good work to avoid repeating bad history.

1. Someone always protects the identity.
"We've always been the affordable option."
Okay, but what if affordable isn't a sustainable position anymore? What if you need to move upmarket? What if your costs have gone up and you can't be the "affordable" choice without destroying your margins? Doesn't matter. Someone will fight to stay affordable because that's the story they've been telling for a decade.

2. Someone always knows what customers think.
"Our customers wouldn't understand that."
Really? Did you ask them? Or are you projecting your own feelings and confusion onto them?
Most of the time, it's projection. The team member is uncomfortable with the change, so they assume customers will be too. But they frame it as customer insight because that's harder to argue with.

3. Someone always cites industry norms.
"That's not how our industry works." Or...
"Healthcare brands don't do that." Or...
"B2B companies can't market like B2C companies."
These aren't rules. They're just observations about what everyone else is doing. And if you want to differentiate, doing what everyone else does is precisely the wrong move. But people say it anyway because industry norms feel safe.

If someone asked you which brands you admired or which marketing campaign you thought was amazing, I very much doubt you'd mention a "safe" one.
In fact, some brands seek out agencies specifically because they "understand the industry," and are therefore the safe choice. Which sounds smart until you realize that agency has done fifteen rebrands within the same industry, and they're all starting to look the same.
The agency with deep industry knowledge isn't going to challenge your assumptions—they're going to reinforce them. They've got templates. They lean on what has worked for them in the past. They've seen what gets approved by boards in your industry.
So you end up with professional, polished work that looks exactly like your competitors because the agency's institutional knowledge is just your industry's conventional wisdom with better production values.
Sometimes, the agency that lives outside your industry is the one that can see the path more clearly.

The safe rebrand, the one that makes everyone comfortable, usually fails.
Not spectacularly. Just quietly. Sure, you will end up with something that looks like a refresh. Slightly cleaner logo. Slightly brighter colors. Slightly more modern typography. But nothing fundamentally different and nothing that addresses the true business needs. Then two years later, you want to launch a new product or service. And it doesn't fit.
The brand promise you kept because it felt safe is now limiting what you can do. So you either force the new product into a position that doesn't work, or you start creating sub-brands with no real system.
Now you've got a mess. Or you try to move upmarket and realize your brand is positioned as "affordable." You can change the pricing, but you can't change the perception because the brand architecture won't let you.
Or a competitor makes a bold move and suddenly your safe rebrand looks dated. And you're scrambling to catch up while kissing that initial investment of time and money goodbye.
I'm not saying you should ignore institutional knowledge. But I am saying most companies use it wrong.
Stop asking "Does this feel like us?"
That question is backward-looking. It invites people to compare new work against current state. It's a comfort test pretending to be a strategy test.
Instead, ask "Does this give us room to grow?"
That question forces forward thinking. It's about flexibility. About whether the system can handle products that don't exist yet. About whether you're building something that scales or something that boxes you in.
Most rebrands fail because teams are answering the wrong question.

Bold doesn't mean loud and obnoxious. It doesn't mean bright colors and dramatic typography. Bold means building strategic permission to grow. It means designing for products and markets that don't exist yet. It means trusting your agency team enough to push you past what's comfortable.
The rebrand that makes everyone slightly uncomfortable is probably right. The one that makes everyone comfortable probably won't last or get noticed.
Your institutional knowledge people may push back. That's fine. That's their job. They're supposed to pressure-test the work and make sure you're not doing something stupid. Your job is to hold the line on growth and the organization's long-term ambitions. To keep the conversation focused on tomorrow, not yesterday. To make sure comfort isn't the deciding factor.
Because the brand you need isn't the brand you have, and the people who built what you have can't always see what you need.
So, when the work makes you uncomfortable but is strategically sound, build it anyway.
Sign up for our monthly newsletter to receive updates.
Your brand position, at its core, is a statement reflecting the perception your desired target audience holds to represent your values, offerings,...
As companies grow, they typically evolve into needing sub-brands. A sub-brand is simply a division or subsidiary of an existing brand.
When it comes to hotel marketing, showcasing your property is of utmost importance. Prospective guests not only need to get a sense for the type of...